Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013 Sep;43(8):611–631. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2013.822844

Table 3.

Concordance between genetically modified assays, the NTP bioassays and human evaluations.

Model Positive Negative Overall
Concordance with NTP mouse carcinogens
Trp53+/ 7/20 (35%) 10/10 (100%) 17/30 (57%)
Tg.AC 12/23 (52%) 8/10 (80%) 20/33 (61%)
rasH2 16/20 (80%) 7/8 (88%) 23/28 (82%)
Concordance with trans-species mouse and rat carcinogens
Trp53+/ 5/14 (36%) 9/9 (100%) 14/23 (61%)
Tg.AC 7/14 (50%) 8/10 (80%) 15/24 (63%)
rasH2 14/16 (88%) 7/8 (88%) 21/24 (88%)
Concordance with known or likely human carcinogens
Trp53+/ 6/14 (43%)
Tg.AC 8/12 (67%)
rasH2 12/14 (86%)