Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Psychol. 2015 May 1;79:68–101. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.04.001

Table 3.

Experiment 3 standard analysis results and effect sizes derived from a mixed-effects model (N trials = 3,402).

β  Approximate effect size (ms) SE  t 
Intercept −13.50 740.96 0.38 −35.75 *
Trial number 0.0076 0.42 0.0025 3.01 *
Contextn (Sentence) −3.78 −212.79 0.48 −7.86 *
Ordinal position 0.16 9.03 0.051 3.20 *
Ordinal position * Contextn 0.04 −2.92 0.11 0.36
Contextn-1 (Sentence) 0.054 2.96 0.11 0.49
Contextn-1 * Contextn −0.38 −24.41 0.22 −1.75 †

Note. Naming latencies were inversely transformed and multiplied by −10,000. Fixed effects of contextn, ordinal position, and their interaction were allowed to vary by all random factors (subjects, semantic categories, pictures). Approximate effect sizes represent slopes computed on back-transformed condition means, and may not always have the same sign as their corresponding beta estimates for non-significant effects. Words in parentheses denote factor levels for which positive beta estimates would indicate slower naming latencies.

†

p < .10.

*

p < .05.