Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Psychol. 2015 May 1;79:68–101. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.04.001

Table 4.

Experiment 3 deviancy analysis results and effect sizes derived from a mixed-effects model (N trials = 1,856).

β  Approximate effect size (ms) SE  t 
Intercept −13.32 750.66 0.42 −31.66 *
Trial number −0.0015 −0.083 0.0041 −0.36
Contextn (Sentence) −3.89 −224.76 0.45 −8.59 *
Deviancy (Deviant) −0.13 −7.07 0.22 −0.57
Deviancy * Contextn 0.17 14.43 0.44 0.38
Contextn-1 (Sentence) 0.14 7.71 0.19 0.73
Contextn-1 * Contextn −0.47 −33.22 0.38 −1.23

Note. Naming latencies were inversely transformed and multiplied by −10,000. Fixed effects of contextn, deviancy, and their interaction were allowed to vary by all random factors (subjects, semantic categories, pictures). Approximate effect sizes represent slopes computed on back-transformed condition means, and may not always have the same sign as their corresponding beta estimates for non-significant effects. Words in parentheses denote factor levels for which positive beta estimates would indicate slower naming latencies.

†

p < .10.

*

p < .05.