Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Psychol. 2015 May 1;79:68–101. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.04.001

Table 5.

Experiment 3 omnibus analysis results and effect sizes derived from a mixed-effects model (N trials = 4,231).

β Approximate effect size (ms) SE t
Intercept −13.41 745.63 0.39 −34.43 *
Trial number 0.0048 0.27 0.0025 1.94
Contextn (Sentence) −3.78 −215.32 0.31 −12.27 *
Bare ordinal position 0.21 11.66 0.072 2.87 *
Bare ordinal position * Contextn 0.12 0.30 0.21 0.57
Sentence ordinal position 0.19 10.69 0.072 2.64 *
Sentence ordinal position * Contextn 0.056 −2.95 0.22 0.25
Contextn-1 (Sentence) 0.11 6.02 0.25 0.44
Contextn-1 * Contextn −0.42 −28.49 0.49 −0.85

Note. Naming latencies were inversely transformed and multiplied by −10,000. All fixed effects except trial number were allowed to vary by all random factors (subjects, semantic categories, pictures). Approximate effect sizes represent slopes computed on back-transformed condition means, and may not always have the same sign as their corresponding beta estimates for non-significant effects. Words in parentheses denote factor levels for which positive beta estimates would indicate slower naming latencies.

p < .10.

*

p < .05.