Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec 30;212(6):761.e1–761.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.028

Figure 1. Rate ratio of ENG implant insertion compared to LNG-IUS insertion in 2007–2011, by age group.

Figure 1

Figure 1 descriptive sentence: Trends in the insertion rates of the ENG implant compared to LNG-IUS across time for 15 – 19 year olds, 20–24 year olds, and 25–44 year olds.

Age Inline graphic15–19 Inline graphic20–24 Inline graphic25–40