Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 5;18(12):2220–2230. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002742

Table 5.

Bivariate and adjusted associations between food access and purchasing practice indicators, diet and BMI; baseline data from the Pittsburgh Hill/Homewood Research on Eating, Shopping and Health (PHRESH) study, May–December 2011

BMI Healthy Eating Index-2005
Food access and purchasing practice indicator Category Unadjusted bivariate Adjusted association Unadjusted bivariate Adjusted association
Distance to the nearest full-service supermarket (miles) 0·29 0·21 −0·34 −0·01
Distance to major food shopping (miles) 0·18** 0·12 0·003 0·06
Drive or get a ride to food shopping 0·36 0·18 2·46** 1·28
Store type where respondent shops Supercentre 1·72* 1·05 0·04 1·13
Wholesale club 1·52 0·90 2·65 2·21
Discount grocery store 2·08 1·45 −0·79 0·81
Specialty grocery store −2·95 −3·10 7·70** 6·96**
Meat/seafood market −2·06 −2·82 −3·93 −1·69
Shopping frequency 0·01 0·16 0·81 0·47
Shopping duration (min) 0·01* 0·005 −0·01 −0·004
Food expenditures per person per week −0·01 −0·0003 0·01 0·004

*P<0·01, **P<0·001.

Adjusted for age, gender, household income, educational attainment, marital status and number of children in the household.