Skip to main content
. 2015 May;10(3):307–327. doi: 10.1177/1745691614568482

Table 1.

Summary of Differences Between the Literatures

Study characteristic Intergroup interaction literature Intergroup contact literature
Dominant study design Experimental Cross-sectional
Interaction setting Artificial Real-life
Susceptibility to demand characteristics Less susceptible More susceptible
Number of interactions Single occasion Measures quantity of intergroup interactions or even close cross-group relationships
Duration of interactions Shorter Longer (including close relationships)
Familiarity Unknown outgroup member Both known and unknown outgroup members
Experience May or may not have prior experience Have prior experience by default
Outcome measures State-level outcome measures; self-relevant intrapsychic outcomes Trait-level outcome measures; other-relevant outcomes
Intergroup domain Typically race or ethnicity Broader range (e.g., race, sexual orientation, age, disabled) but most often race or ethnicity
Outcomes Intergroup anxiety; discomfort Less intergroup anxiety; less prejudice

Note: The table reflects typical or dominant conditions. There are exceptions, as discussed in the article.