Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 5;473(7):2362–2368. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4090-z

Table 1.

Study patient characteristics

Demographics Enrollment Followup
Number of patients 81 52
Age (years; range) 49 ± 15 (22–81) 51 ± 14 (26–81)
Men 46% (37) 46% (24)
Diagnosis related to injury 42% (34) 40% (21)
Additional comorbidities 35% (28) 27% (14)
 Circulatory 14% (11) 12% (6)
 Musculoskeletal 11% (9) 10% (5)
 Other 10% (8) 6% (3)
Marital status
 Single 29% (23) 21% (11)
 Partner/married 57% (46) 63% (33)
 Separated/widowed 15% (12) 15% (8)
New patient 56% (45) 54% (28)
Tobacco use 11% (9) 13% (7)
Employed 77% (62) 75% (39)
Patient-reported outcomes
 PROMIS upper extremity 39 ± 11 40 ± 11
 PROMIS depression 48 ± 10 45 ± 12
 PROMIS pain interference 58 ± 9.1 55 ± 10
Office times (minutes)
 Wait time (range) 32 ± 18 (8–84) 31 ± 17 (8–76)
 Time with clinician (range) 7.6 ± 5.2 (1–28) 7.7 ± 5.2 (1–28)
Satisfaction
 Surgeon listened carefully
  No 0 4% (2)
  Somewhat yes 4% (3) 10% (5)
  Yes 96% (78) 86% (45)
 Surgeon showed respect
  No 0 2% (1)
  Somewhat yes 1% (1) 8% (4)
  Yes 99% (80) 90% (47)
 Surgeon spent enough time with the patient
  No 2% (2) 6% (3)
  Somewhat yes 12% (10) 15% (8)
  Yes 85% (69) 79% (41)
 Rating of surgeon
  0–3 0 4% (2)
  4–7 5% (4) 8% (4)
  8–10 95% (77) 88% (46)
 Aggregate satisfaction score 0.96 ± 0.1 0.91 ± 0.2

Continuous variables as mean ± SD; discrete variables as percentage (number); PROMIS = Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System.