Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 12;30(5):449–457. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0004-y

Table 2.

Odds ratio of ACPA-positive RA, ACPA-negative RA and RA overall according to ever, current and past use of PMH among women aged 50–70

ACPA status Use of PMH Ca/Co OR 95 % CIa OR 95 % CIb
ACPA-positive Everc 90/304 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 0.9 (0.6–1.2)
Current 22/105 0.6 (0.4–1.0) 0.6 (0.3–0.9)
Past 68/197 1.0 (0.7–1.4) 1.1 (0.8–1.5)
Never 209/626 1.0 1.0
Missingd 4/5
ACPA-negative Ever 55/304 1.1 (0.7–1.5) 1.0 (0.7–1.4)
Current 18/105 1.0 (0.6–1.7) 0.9 (0.5–1.5)
Past 37/197 1.1 (0.7–1.7) 1.1 (0.7–1.7)
Never 109/626 1.0 1.0
Missingd 0/5
RA overall Ever 145/304 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 0.9 (0.7–1.2)
Current 40/105 0.7 (0.5–1.1) 0.7 (0.4–1.0)
Past 105/197 1.1 (0.8–1.4) 1.1 (0.8–1.4)
Never 318/626 1.0 1.0
Missingd 4/5

EIRA, Sweden, 2006–2011

ACPA antibodies to citrullinated peptides antigens, PMH postmenopausal hormone, RA rheumatoid arthritis, Ca/Co number of cases/controls, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

aAdjusted by age and residential area

bAdjusted by age, residential area and smoking (pack-years)

cTwo controls had only information on year of initiation and type of therapy and they were defined as ever users

dMissing information on PMH use