Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):e0129267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129267

Table 1. Datasets.

Dataset Original size Size after filtering 1 Data source
I. Datasets of all drugs
Detrimental drug interactions 2
Severe A 21831 10323 Drugs.com
Moderate B 112976 92958 Drugs.com
Minor C 13143 17973 Drugs.com
Beneficial drug interactions 3 , 4 D 429 293 DCDB, TTD
II. Cancer-related datasets
Detrimental drug interactions 2
Severe E 1053 817 Drugs.com
Moderate F 6857 5700 Drugs.com
Minor G 273 241 Drugs.com
Beneficial drug interactions 3 , 5 H 55 33 DCDB, TTD
III. Negative datasets used in ROC analysis
 All FDA-approved drugs 6 I 848253 733542 Drugbank
Random drugs 7 J 427350 426425 -

1We filtered the available drug pairs by leaving out the drug combinations where the components have exactly the same targets, or the components were structurally similar, as described in Methods. The drugs with no available targets were also discarded

2Taken from Drugs.com (November 11, 2013) as described in the methods

3Taken from the Drug Combination Database (March 8, 2012) and the Therapeutic Target Database (July 23, 2012) as described in the methods

4All approved drug combinations were included

5All approved drug combinations that are used in cancer treatment.

6We made all possible binary combinations of FDA-approved drugs (taken from DrugBank, 12th September of 2012), and then leaved out all pairs that were listed as beneficial or detrimental combinations.

7We constructed random drugs corresponding to the number of targets of all individual drugs. We generated 25 random drugs for each target count (37). From this pool we made the all possible binary combinations. In each case, we randomly selected a negative set of the size which was 5 times greater than the positive dataset [51].