Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 24;25(7):1975–1983. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3607-5

Table 4.

Percentage of chosen prostheses of particular sizes from different vendors based on vendors’ sizing recommendations

Mean diameter Circumference-derived diameter
Prosthesis size Min (%) Max (%) Min (%) Max (%)
Edwards Sapien valve
 20 mm 0 0 0 0
 23 mm 11 0 11 0
 26 mm 38 23 44 20
 29 mm 22 31 17 27
 23/26 mm 14 5 9 5
 26/29 mm 16 20 17 22
 Not matched 0 20 2 27
CoreValve
 23 mm 2 0 6 0
 26 mm 39 14 45 20
 29 mm 50 50 44 56
 31 mm 0 19 5 3
 23/26 mm 2 0 3 0
 26/29 mm 2 0 0 0
 29/31 mm 6 17 2 17
 Not matched 0 0 0 0
JenaValve
 23 mm 33 16 39 16
 25 mm 30 31 41 45
 27 mm 27 14 5 31
 Not matched 11 19 16 8

Theoretical selection based on mean diameter and circumference-derived diameter—the largest of the commonly used dimensions in our study population