Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Radiol. 2015 Apr 23;25(7):2089–2102. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3603-9

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

3D image quality assessment. Five 3D images from a single patient in a 56 year old male with a BMI of 24 and SD effective dose of 1.5 mSv and RD effective dose of 0.3mSv. One of the sites of 3D image quality assessment was the rectal catheter, as shown here on SD-FBP (A), RD-FBP (B), RD-PICCS (C), RD-MBIR (D), RD-ASIR (E).