Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Radiol. 2015 Apr 23;25(7):2089–2102. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3603-9

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Polyp conspicuity assessment. 3D images at the level of the rectal catheter demonstrate a 7 mm sessile hyperplastic polyp in a patient with a BMI of 22.9. SD series effective dose was 1.25 mSv, RD series effective dose was 0.32 mSv. Note the conspicuity of the polyp on SD-FBP (A), RD-PICCS (C), and RD-MBIR (D), compared to RD-FBP (B) and RD-ASIR (E).