Skip to main content
. 2015 May 25;2015:361037. doi: 10.1155/2015/361037

Table 1.

Results of the buffalo serological survey by indirect-ELISA in 8 provinces of Thailand.

Region Provinces Census 2009 n n + AP (%) TP (%) PF (%) PiF (%)
(95% CI) (95% CI)
North Maehongson 23,761 100 18 18 13.6 38.1 39.2
(11.7–26.7) (6–23.4)

Northeast Buriram 105,177 138 17 12.3 7.3 30.4 44.9
(7.8–18.8) (1.9–14.7)
Roi Et 70,23 81 11 13.6 8.7 17.1 64.3
(7.8–22.7) (1.7–18.7)
Sakon Nakhon 75,647 208 27 13.0 8 18 79.7
(9.1–18.2) (3.5–13.8)
Sisaket 98,427 59 1 1.7 0 4.5 100.0 (1 infected)
(0.3–9) (0–3.3)
Surin 120,886 73 7 9.6 4.2 25 45.7
(4.7–18.5) (0–14.1)
Ubon Ratcha. 136,528 138 6 4.3 0 10.8 47.2
(2–9.2) (0–7.6)

South Songkhla 4,431 95 22 23.2 19.4 71.4 29.2
(15.8–32.6) (10.8–29.8)

Total 635,087 892 109 12.2 7.2 20.3 55.7
(10.2–14.5) (4.9–9.8)

n: number of serum samples tested. n +: number of seropositive samples by indirect-ELISA. CI: confidence interval. AP: apparent seroprevalence rate per province (AP = n +/n). TP: true prevalence estimates. PF: percentage of infected farms (at least one seropositive sample). PiF: mean seroprevalence rate on infected farms.