Skip to main content
. 2015 May 25;2015:215128. doi: 10.1155/2015/215128

Table 1.

Validation data of linear regression of AFA and IBR in human plasma.

Analyte Regression model VS Concentration
(ng/mL)
Trueness Precision Accuracy Extraction efficiency
Relative bias (%) Repeatability/
intermediate precision (RSD, %)
β-expectation lower and upper tolerance limits of the relative error (%) Average recovery (%) (n = 12, each level)
AFA 1 5 −0.24 5.60/5.65 [−13.38; 12.90] 88.0 ± 2.2
2 25 1.31 5.54/4.94 [−9.96; 12.58]
3 75 0.63 2.70/2.63 [−5.44; 6.71]
4 125 1.29 2.23/2.42 [−4.52; 7.09]
5 175 0.56 1.87/1.66 [−3.23; 4.36]
6 250 −0.25 1.63/1.91 [−4.77; 4.27]
DICLO 250 Internal standard 91 ± 7

IBR 1 5 −1.21 5.83/5.22 [−12.96; 10.54] 93.0 ± 9.0
2 75 7.63 1.96/1.89 [3.28; 11.98]
3 150 0.77 1.85/2.83 [−7.94; 9.48]
4 250 −0.47 1.77/3.47 [−12.89; 11.95]
5 350 0.43 2.02/3.48 [−11.94; 12.79]
6 400 −0.07 1.87/2.25 [−6.00; 5.85]
DICLO 250 Internal standard 90 ± 8

n: number of repetitions.