Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 3;92(6):1271–1279. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0413

Table 3.

Results of demographic and outcome comparisons

MVP 2012* vs. cumulative control MVP 2012* vs. MVP 2011
P value P value
Demographics
 Sex 0.552 0.509
 Age 0.375 0.779
 Retreatment 0.046§ 0.051
Type of tuberculosis
 Pulmonary, sputum positive 0.205 0.880
 Pulmonary, sputum negative 0.503 0.204
 Extra-pulmonary 0.981 0.163
 Unknown 0.015§ 0.163
HIV status
 HIV-positive 0.442 0.241
 HIV-negative 0.636 0.238
 Unknown 0.443 0.953
Patient knows HIV status and received counseling
 Yes 0.981 0.435
 No
 Unknown 0.981 0.953
Enrolled on CPT, where applicable (of all patients/of those applicable)
 Yes 0.636/0.347 0.497/0.204
 No
 Unknown 0.308/0.347 0.140/0.204
Enrolled on ART, where applicable (of all patients/of those applicable)
 Yes 0.472/0.696 0.932/0.630
 No 0.420/0.326 0.967/0.832
 Unknown 0.607/0.990 0.217/0.570
Outcomes
 Cured 0.003 0.050§
 Success 0.464 0.484
 Lost to follow-up 0.090 0.068
 Dead 0.071 0.017§
 Lost or dead 0.010 0.002
 Negative outcomes 0.008 0.002
*

Enrolled on eCompliance.

Given records with unknown gender the values report reflect the most statistically significant Z and P values.

Retreatment, a patient who is returning after default, or receiving retreatment after initial treatment failure, or who has relapsed.

§

Statistically significant at P < 0.05.

Statistically significant at P < 0.01.

A comparison of proportions for the demographic characteristics and outcome indicators for the MVP 2012 cohort, who received the treatment, against the proportions for the control group in the MVP cluster in 2011 and for all of the patients in a control group, respectively.