Table 3.
Relative fit of NFT Models | ||||
Model | χ2:df | RMSEA | CFI | BCC |
1 | 83.40:26, p <0.001 | 0.026 | 0.988 | 185.78 |
2 | 51.14:25, p = 0.002 | 0.018 | 0.994 | 155.53 |
3 | 51.14:25, p = 0.002 | 0.018 | 0.994 | 155.53 |
Relative fit of NP Models | ||||
Model | χ2:df | RMSEA | CFI | BCC |
1 | 77.38:26, p <0.001 | 0.025 | 0.991 | 179.76 |
2 | 51.21:25, p = 0.002 | 0.018 | 0.995 | 155.21 |
3 | 51.21:25, p = 0.002 | 0.018 | 0.995 | 155.21 |
BCC = Browne Cudeck Criteria. Lower values indicating better fit; CFI = Comparative Fit Index. CFI values >0.95 indicate excellent fit; df = degrees of freedom; NFT = Neurofibrillary tangle factor; NP = Neuritic Plaque Factor; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation. RMSEA values ≤ 0.05 indicate a close fit to the data.