Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 7;106(3):357–370. doi: 10.1007/s10533-010-9516-4

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

CO2 fluxes in relation to changes in the most significant abiotic predictor a photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) versus net ecosystem exchange of CO2 (NEE), b air temperature versus ecosystem respiration (R e) and c PAR versus gross ecosystem photosynthesis (GEP) measured in July at Thiisbukta in grazed wet moss tundra (open circle) and 4 year old exclosures (filled circle). The data are from the five occasions CO2 fluxes were measured over a 3-week period in July. Significant regression for the two treatments is shown. Positive fluxes represent an efflux of CO2 whilst negative values indicate uptake of CO2 from the atmosphere