Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 21;300(2):E276–E286. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00262.2010

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Differences in density of surface insulin granules between ASKO and WT islets. Islets from ASKO and WT mice were isolated and cultured in 5.5 mM glucose for 24 h in parallel. A: Ins-C-emGFP expressed in WT islet β-cell 1. B: Ins-C-emGFP expressed in WT islet β-cell 2. C: ultrastructure of WT pancreatic β-cell showing organized clustering of insulin-secretory granules along surface membrane. D: Ins-C-emGFP expressed in ASKO islet β-cell 1. E: Ins-C-emGFP expressed in ASKO islet β-cell 2. F: ultrastructure of ASKO pancreatic β-cell showing disorganized insulin-secretory granules away from surface membrane. G: In electron micrographs, perimeter membrane regions in β-cells were identified facing an islet capillary with red blood cells and compared between ASKO and controls (n = 4 islets each). Density of insulin granules along the surface membrane of β-cells from Ins-C-emGFP-expressing WT (A and B) and ASKO (D and E) islets. Densities were measured by counting the number of fluorescent insulin granules within 1.5 μm of the perimeter membrane of a central optical section, identified by the large oval nuclear region devoid of fluorescence. ×60, oil. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001. Scale bars in confocal fluorescent images are 5 μm and in EM images 500 nm.