Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 3;86(5):1203–1214. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.04.022

Table 2.

Enriched CNS Gene Sets, Combined Analysis

Ngene Combined
Deletion
Duplication
p Padj OR (95% CI) p Padj p Padj
NMDAR network 59 4.3×10−9 1.7×10−6 2.47 (1.8–3.44) 0.045 1 2.5×10−9 1.0×10−6
GABAA 15 3.0×10−6 0.0012 2.51 (1.65–3.97) 0.00068 0.27 5.4×10−5 0.022
Abnormal associative learning 193 1.6×10−5 0.0066 1.38 (1.19–1.61) 1.0 1 1.6×10−10 6.2×10−8
Abnormal long-term potentiation 145 2.0×10−5 0.0081 1.49 (1.24–1.8) 0.58 1 1.1×10−6 0.00044
Abnormal behavior 1,973 5.1×10−5 0.020 1.12 (1.06–1.19) 3.0×10−6 0.0012 0.05 1
Abnormal CNS synaptic transmission 371 5.5×10−5 0.022 1.22 (1.11–1.35) 5.1×10−6 0.002 0.12 1
Thin cerebral cortex 45 0.00018 0.071 1.91 (1.32–2.8) 0.12 1 0.0006 0.24
Abnormal consumption behavior 442 0.00019 0.077 1.24 (1.09–1.41) 0.059 1 0.0005 0.2
Abnormal cued conditioning behavior 68 0.00027 0.11 1.69 (1.24–2.35) 0.55 1 1.4×10−5 0.0055
Abnormal synaptic transmission 437 0.00027 0.11 1.18 (1.08–1.29) 1.1×10−5 0.0044 0.21 1
Abnormal learning/memory/conditioning 424 0.00031 0.12 1.18 (1.08–1.29) 7.3×10−5 0.029 0.089 1
PSD-95 (core) 58 0.00048 0.19 1.71 (1.28–2.28) 4.3×10−11 1.7×10−8 0.97 1
Abnormal contextual conditioning behavior 89 0.00061 0.24 1.53 (1.18–1.99) 0.52 1 0.00011 0.045

CNS gene sets with Puncorrected < 0.001 in the combined analysis of deletions and duplications are listed along with the number of genes in each set, Ngene; uncorrected (p) and Bonferroni-corrected (Padj) p values for enrichment in case CNVs; estimated odds ratios (OR); and p values for enrichment in case deletions and duplications when analyzed separately. Note that while the NMDAR network was analyzed prior to other terms in this table, here it is corrected for the same number of tests as other terms for ease of comparison. See also Tables S1 and S3.