Skip to main content
. 2015 May 11;112(22):E2930–E2938. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423854112

Table 1.

Properties of metagenomic features and detection thresholds

Feature description Short name Sequencing basis Units Confident detection threshold Relaxed detection threshold Confident nondetection threshold Body sites Paired samples per body site
Operational taxonomic units OTUs 16S rRNA gene Relative abundance >1e−3 >1e−4 <1e−5 18 25–105
Microbial species Species Whole metagenome shotgun Relative abundance >1e−3 >1e−4 <1e−5 6 14–50
Species-specific marker genes Markers Whole metagenome shotgun RPKM >5 >0.5 <0.05 6 14–50
Kilobase windows from microbial reference genomes kbwindows Whole metagenome shotgun RPKM >5 >0.5 <0.05 6 9–45

In analyses of per-feature stability, a feature was considered detected if its abundance exceeded the confident detection threshold; a feature was considered acquired if it initially fell below the confident nondetection threshold and then later exceeded the confident detection threshold. When defining a metagenomic code, features with abundance between the confident detection and confident nondetection thresholds were considered ambiguous. When reevaluating a code at a later time point, the relaxed feature detection thresholds were used to add robustness to temporal variation.