Skip to main content
. 2015 May 29;8(Suppl 2):S10. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-8-S2-S10

Table 2.

Performance comparison of gene marker prediction methods.

Gene Symbol NONE DEG DEG+GRN DEG+GRN+Pathway DEG+GRN+Pathway+SNV
Relb HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Nfkb2 HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Tnfrsf9 HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Tnfrsf21
Icos HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Il2ra HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Cysltr1 HIT HIT
Kit HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Il1r2 HIT HIT HIT HIT
Il13 HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Il5 HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Areg HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Il1rl1 HIT HIT HIT
Ccr8 HIT HIT
Tph1 HIT HIT
Htr1b
Cd244 HIT HIT HIT HIT
Lta HIT HIT HIT HIT
Il10 HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Tnf HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Nfkbia HIT HIT HIT HIT
Cdkn2b HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Lif HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Il2ra HIT HIT HIT HIT HIT
Il9r HIT HIT
Il24

Num of Hits 23 23 19 18 14
Selected Candidates 12298 2153 1184 478 343

Precision 0.002 0.011 0.016 0.038 0.041
Recall 0.885 0.885 0.731 0.692 0.538
F-measure 0.004 0.021 0.032 0.073 0.076
Accuracy 0.002 0.827 0.905 0.962 0.972