Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 9;10(6):e0129452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129452

Table 2. Comparison of methylation status of gene promoter in cervical samples with different diagnosis—only statistically significant (Fisher’s exact test) increased methylation changes are presented.

Hypermethylation (N) Gene promoter p
LSIL/CIN1 (40) vs. normal (40) C13ORF18 0.036738
HSIL/CIN2 (39) vs. normal (40) C13ORF18 0.036738
HSIL/CIN3 (42) vs. normal (40) CCNA1 0.010994
HSIL/CIN2 (39) vs. LSIL/CIN1 (40) RARβ2 0.024696
TWIST1 0.001030
HSIL (81) vs. normal (40) CCNA1 0.042593
C13ORF18 0.043737
LSIL + HSIL (121) vs. normal (40) CCNA1 0.023742
C13ORF18 0.022603
CC (10) vs. normal (40) CCNA1 0.000086
C13ORF18 0.000001
hTERT1 0.000001
hTERT2 0.000866
TWIST1 0.003709
CC (10) vs. HSIL/CIN3 (42) CCNA1 0.031319
C13ORF18 0.000107
hTERT1 0.000090
hTERT2 0.000067
TWIST1 0.000969
CC (10) vs. LSIL + HSIL (121) CCNA1 0.003007
C13ORF18 0.000070
RARβ2 0.042019
hTERT1 0.000017
hTERT2 0.000026
TWIST1 0.000031

LSIL, low-grade squamous cell intraepithelial lesion; HSIL, high-grade squamous cell intraepithelial lesion; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; CC, cervical cancer.