Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jul 14;146(3):669–673. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3047-y

Table 1.

Health utility/disutility weights

Utilities Weighted average values Original values (distributions) Source
Base state–Stable disease 0.715 0.715 Lloyd et al. [9]
Disutility
 Grade 3 and 4 adverse events
  Arm 1
   Stomatitis 0.01208 0.151 (8 %) Lloyd et al. [9]; Baselga et al. [3]
   Anemia 0.00906 0.151 (6 %)a Lloyd et al. [9]; Baselga et al. [3]
   Dyspnea 0.00604 0.151 (4 %)a Lloyd et al. [9]; Baselga et al. [3]
   Hyperglycemia 0.00604 0.151 (4 %)a Lloyd et al. [9]; Baselga et al. [3]
   Fatigue 0.0046 0.115 (4 %) Lloyd et al. [9]; Baselga et al. [3]
   Pneumonitis 0.00453 0.151 (3 %)a Lloyd et al. [9]; Baselga et al. [3]
  Arm 0
   Stomatitis 0.00151 0.151 (1 %) Lloyd et al. [9]; Baselga et al. [3]
   Anemia 0.00151 0.151 (1 %)a Lloyd et al. [9]; Baselga et al. [3]
   Dyspnea 0.00151 0.151 (1 %)a Lloyd et al. [9]; Baselga et al. [3]
   Hyperglycemia 0.00151 0.151 (1 %)a Lloyd et al. [9]; Baselga et al. [3]
   Fatigue 0.00115 0.115 (1 %) Lloyd et al. [9]; Baselga et al. [3]
   Pneumonitis 0 0.151 (0 %)a Lloyd et al. [9]; Baselga et al. [3]

Treatment arm 0: Exemestane only; Treatment arm 1: Everolimus plus Exemestane

a

To obtain the utility decrements for adverse events, for which values were not available in the literature, we multiplied the highest utility decrement value available (0.151) by the proportion of patients experiencing these adverse events