Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem. 2015 Apr 16;23(13):3542–3551. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.04.022

Table 1.

Comparison of the cell growth inhibitory effects of mono- and bis-epipodophyllotoxins and etoposide towards K562 cells and etoposide-resistant K/VP.5 cells

Compound linker sizea K562 IC50 (μM) K/VP.5 IC50 (μM) RRb mean NCI-60 cell GI50 (μM)
6a 3 1.27 13.3 10.5 ND
6c 8 0.103 0.556 5.4 ND
6d 10 0.026 0.156 6.0 ND
7a 3 0.525 7.5 14.2 NDc
7b 6 0.041 0.88 21.5 3.7
7c 8 0.016 0.115 7.4 ND
7d 10 0.044 0.114 2.6 0.47
7e 12 0.067 0.549 8.2 ND
Etoposided - 0.163 2.50 15.4 12d
a

Number of methylene groups linking the two piperazine groups.

b

RR is relative resistance (K/VP.5 IC50) K562 IC50). The K562 and K/VP.5 IC50 values are averages from experiments carried out on two separate days.

c

1-dose NCI-60 data for this compound is given in Supplemental Figure 3

d

NCI mean GI50 data from 38 experiments (http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/compare).

ND is not determined.