Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2015 Feb 2;27(2):710–725. doi: 10.1037/a0038555

Table 7.

Zero-Order Validity Correlations at T3 and T4

TPTO:YAB-Tot TPTO:YAB-ECO TPTO:YAB-YBO

Measure and Scale T3 T4 T3 T4 T3 T4
APQ Inconsistent Discipline .29** .23** .22* .22** .31** .20*
APQ Poor Monitoring .21* .34** .13 .27** .27** .38**
SRD General Delinquency −.06 −.19* .03 −.11 −.18 −.25**
SIPA Incompetence/Guilt −.20* −.21** −.13 −.20* −.24* −.19*
CBCL Externalizing −.19 −.29** −.09 −.18* −.29** −.38**
CBCL Internalizing −.11 −.32** −.06 −.24** −.15 −.36**

Note. n = 111 at T3; n = 163 (TPTO:YAB-YBO) and 162 (TPTO:YAB-Tot, TPTO:YAB-ECO) at T4; Correlations calculated using SPSS v. 20. APQ = Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (caregiver report); SRD = Self-Report Delinquency (youth report); SIPA = Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (caregiver report); CBCL = Child Behavior Checklist (caregiver report); T3 = Time 3 (mid-treatment), T4 = Time 4 (post-treatment). Higher scores on APQ reflect better parenting.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.