(A) (a) Compression stress test. Images of mouse lenses compressed by
coverslips. Red line on WT - equatorial plane; green line - axial plane. Axial strain-load
curves of: (b) 1-month-old WT, AQP0+/− and
AQP0−/− mice and (c) 2.5 month-old lenses of WT
and AQP0+/− mice. Equatorial strain-load curves of:
(d) 1-month old WT, AQP0+/− and
AQP0−/− mice and (e) 2.5 month-old lenses of WT
and AQP0+/− mice. (f) Confocal imaging of lens
suture morphology of WT and AQP0+/− mouse without (0 mg) or
with (576 mg) coverslip squeezing. Small square areas denoted in the lenses are magnified
to the right to show splitted suture area in AQP0+/− (bottom)
and intact suture in WT (top). B. (a) Schematic model illustrating the role of AQP0
in lens biomechanics. Packed closer, outer cortical fiber cells of WT show
characteristic hexagonal architecture with least extracellular space. Cytoskeletal
proteins are tethered to AQP0 at the membrane. (b) Loss of fiber cell AQP0
causes loss of cellular architecture possibly due to loss of fiber to fiber adhesion and
interaction with cytoskeletal networks. (c,d). Schematic of the possible mechanism
of mammalian lens accommodation. While focusing near objects, ciliary muscles
contract, the suspensory ligaments relax and the lens appears round (4Bc). While focusing
far objects, the opposite events happen (4Bd). Note, the shape of the lens nucleus does
not change. AQP0 may facilitate lens accommodation by establishing appropriate spatial
biomechanics at the cortex and nucleus.