Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 10.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem J. 2011 Mar 1;434(2):265–274. doi: 10.1042/BJ20102012

Table 1. Breeding strategy used to generate TAPP1R211L/R211L, TAPP2R218L/R218L and TAPP1R211L/R211LTAPP2R218L/R218L knock-in mice.

Single homozygous TAPP1R211L/R211L and TAPP2R218L/R218L, as well as double TAPP1R211L/R211LTAPP2R218L/R218L, knock-in mice were bred using the strategy depicted in the Table and the progeny was genotyped as described in the Materials and methods section. The number and the percentage of each genotype are indicated followed by its expected Mendelian frequency. In the case of the double TAPP1R211L/R211LTAPP2R218L/R218L knock-in mice, as wild-type littermates and double knock-in mice can only be obtained at a ratio of 1:16 in the same cross, we interbred TAPP1R211L/R211LTAPP2R218L/R218L and TAPP1R211L/R211LTAPP2R218L/R218L as well as TAPP1+/+TAPP2+/+ and TAPP1+/+TAPP2+/+ littermates derived from a 1:16 ratio mating.

Cross Genotype Number born Expected Mendelian frequency (%)
TAPP1+/R211L and TAPP1+/R211L TAPP1+/+ 11 (24.45 %) 25
TAPP1+/R2111L 23 (51.1 %) 50
TAPP1R211L/R211L 11 (24.45 %) 25
TAPP2+/R218L and TAPP2+/R218L TAPP2+/+ 21 (31.8 %) 25
TAPP2+/R218L 28 (42.4 %) 50
TAPP2R218L/R218L 17 (25.8 %) 25
TAPP1+/R211LTAPP2+/R218L and TAPP1+/R211LTAPP2+/R218L TAPP1+/+TAPP2+/+ 6 (5.7 %) 6.25
TAPP1R211L/R211LTAPP2R218L/R218L 5 (4.8 %) 6.25
TAPP1+/R211LTAPP2+/R218L 28 (26.7 %) 25
TAPP1+/R211LTAPP2+/+ 19 (18.1 %) 12.5
TAPP1+/+TAPP2+/R218L 14 (13.3 %) 12.5
TAPP1R211L/R211LTAPP2+/+ 4 (3.8 %) 6.25
TAPP1+/+TAPP2R218L/R218L 5 (4.8 %) 6.25
TAPP1R211L/R211LTAPP2+/R218L 14 (13.3 %) 12.5
TAPP1+/R211LTAPP2R218L/R218L 10 (9.5 %) 12.5
TAPP1+/+TAPP2+/+ and TAPP1+/+TAPP2+/+ TAPP1+/+TAPP2+/+ 100%
TAPP1R211L/R211LTAPP2R218L/R218L and TAPP1R211L/R211LTAPP2R218L/R218L TAPP1R211L/R211LTAPP2R218L/R218L 100%