Table 4. Comparision of cosmesic outcomes between using acellular dermal matrix group and latissimus dorsi muscle onlay patch group.
| ADM* (n=28) (%) |
LD† muscle onlay patch (n=32) (%) |
P value | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |||
| Overall satisfaction | 9 (32.1) | 15 (53.6) | 2 (7.1) | 2 (7.1) | 16 (50.0) | 11 (34.4) | 5 (15.6) | 0 | 0.429 | |
| Breast symmetry | 5 (17.9) | 14 (50.0) | 9 (32.1) | 0 | 20 (62.5) | 11 (34.4) | 1 (3.1) | 0 | <0.001 | |
| Breast shape | 9 (21.1) | 13 (46.4) | 6 (21.4) | 0 | 16 (50.0) | 13 (40.6) | 3 (9.4) | 0 | 0.008 | |
| Breast softness | 7 (25.0) | 16 (57.1) | 4 (14.3) | 1 (3.6) | 13 (40.6) | 15 (46.9) | 3 (9.4) | 1 (3.1) | 0.217 | |
| Tension with movement | 17 (60.7) | 8 (28.6) | 2 (7.1) | 1 (3.6) | 24 (75.0) | 5 (15.6) | 3 (9.4) | 0 | 0.450 | |
*, acellular dermal matrix; † latissumus dorsi.