Table 2.
Ref. | Treatment | Indication | Patients (n) | Conclusion | |
CD | Niv et al[2] | Yes | SB mucosa evaluation of known CD patients | 19 | Musocal findings are independent from clinical and laboratory parameters |
CD | Hall et al[1] | Yes | SB mucosal healing and deep remission rates assessment on 12 wk of treatment of known symptomatic CD patients | 43 | Symptomatic and biochemical response to treatment is not mirrored by mucosal healing |
CD | Hall et al[33] | Yes | SB mucosal healing and deep remission rates assessment on 52 wk of treatment of known symptomatic CD patients | 43 | Symptomatic and biochemical response to treatment appears to be mirrored by endoscopic remission in 42% of individuals |
CD | Efthymiou et al[3] | Yes | SB mucosal healing assessment of known symptomatic CD patients | 40 | Clinical response does not correlate closely with mucosal healing in patients with CD of the small bowel |
CD | Tsibouris et al[32] | Yes | Assessment of detection rate of small bowel ulcerative lesions and completion rate in CD patients in acute phase and remission | 102 | SB aphthous ulcers are present a month after entering clinical remission |
CD: Crohn’s disease; SB: Small bowel; CRP: C-reactive protein.