Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 4;14:10. doi: 10.1186/s12952-015-0029-5

Table 4.

Comparison between MAF in our data set and the data set from Lu et al. 2013 [15] Nat Genetics

SNP and MA Data from the this study Data from Lu et al. 2013 [15]
(108 cases/300 controls) (652 cases/2,761 controls)
Lead SNP Allele MAF (cases) MAF (controls) OR MAF (cases) MAF (controls) OR p-value
rs7606754 A 0.34 0.37 0.9 0.37 0.33 1.2 6.0E-03
rs4894535a T 0.16 0.12 1.4 0.21 0.16 1.5 1.3E-06
rs1324183 A 0.25 0.28 0.9 0.24 0.2 1.3 8.8E-05
rs1536482 A 0.45 0.41 1.1 0.4 0.34 1.3 1.2E-03
rs7044529a T 0.14 0.13 1.1 0.18 0.14 1.3 3.0E-04
rs11145951a T 0.44 0.49 0.82 0.45 0.49 0.89 0.03
rs2721051a T 0.14 0.11 1.4 0.14 0.1 1.5 3.2E-06
rs9938149 C 0.29 0.32 0.9 0.32 0.36 1.2 7.1E-03

SNP single nucleotide polymorphism; MA minor allele; MAF minor allele frequency; OR odds ratio

a These SNPs had similar trends of allele frequency changes between cases and controls as those reported by Lu et al. [15]