Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb;36(2):259–264. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4103

Table 3:

Differences of clinical and imaging thresholds in patients receiving thrombolysis versus untreated patients

No Reperfusion Therapy IV and/or IA Therapy P Value
DWI
    AUC ± SE for predicting poor outcome 0.935 ± 0.06 0.724 ± 0.05 .011
    90% Specificity for poor outcome (prognostic yield) (mL) >19.7 (42.3%) >51.8 (19.5%) .016a
    95% Specificity for poor outcome (prognostic yield) (mL) >20.5 (40.5%) >74.8 (16.1%) .007a
>30.6 (35.1%) >103.1 (10.4%) .003a
NIHSS score
    AUC ± SE for predicting poor outcome 0.903 ± 0.06 0.827 ± 0.04 .314
    90% Specificity for poor outcome (prognostic yield) >12 (37.8%) >16 (23.0%) .142a
    95% Specificity for poor outcome (prognostic yield) >15 (27.0%) >19 (14.9%) .182a
    100% Specificity for poor outcome (prognostic yield) >17 (16.2%) >20 (9.2%) .414a
a

P value for comparison among prognostic yields.