Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 1;49(1):57–65. doi: 10.5152/tpa.2014.984

Table 4.

Distribution of states of difficulty of physicans who confronted with a case before in child abuse and neglect

Variables Resident n=200 (%)# Specialist n=100 (%)# Practitioner n=250 (%)# Total n=550 (%)#
States of difficulty (n=360)NS
History 61 (43.3) 23 (28) 64 (46.7) 148 (41.1)
Physical examination 56 (39.7) 30 (36.6) 39 (28.5) 125 (34.7)
Keeping record 49 (34.8) 28 (34.1) 53 (38.7) 130 (36.1)
Communication with instutions/legal process 73 (51.8) 44 (53.7) 92 (67.2) 209 (58.1)
Other 1 (0.7) 2 (2.4) 0 (0) 3 (0.8)
Type of notice (n=467)*
Keeping a legal report 130 (78.3) 58 (66.7) 93 (43.5) 281 (60.2)
Written notice to prosecution 12 (7.2) 4 (4.6) 33 (15.4) 49 (10.5)
Written notice to SSCPI 51 (30.7) 32 (36.8) 59 (27.6) 142 (30.4)
Reporting the police 31 (18.7) 18 (20.7) 131 (61.2) 180 (38.5)
Other 8 (4.8) 5 (5.7) 0 (0) 13 (2.8)
Reasons for not making a notice (n=83)NS
Lack of sufficent knowledge 31 (91.2) 10 (76.9) 24 (66.7) 65 (78.3)
Lack of knowledge of where to make the notice 26 (76.5) 8 (61.5) 23 (63.9) 57 (68.7)
Lack of time 4 (11.8) 5 (38.5) 7 (19.4) 16 (19.3)
Other 0 (0) 0 (0) 12 (33.3) 12 (14.4)
#

Since a person can mark more than one option, the percentage is obtained according to the answers given. In statisitcal analysis, the people who marked the answer “Other” were excluded and the chi-square test was performed,

NSp>0.05 Insignificant,

*

p<0.001

SSCPI: Social service and Children Portection Institution