Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 11;350:h2613. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2613

Table 3.

 Comparison of study characteristics reported in FDA premarket approval summaries with corresponding publications and those published studies. Figures are numbers (percentage) unless stated otherwise

All (n=86) Pivotal (n=66)*
Summary Published Odds ratio (95% CI), P value† Summary Published Odds ratio (95% CI), P value†
Randomized 34 (40) 34 (40) 1.00 (0.43 to 2.33), 1.0 28 (42) 28 (42) 1.00 (0.38 to 2.62), 1.0
Blinded studies 23 (27) 23 (27) 1.00 (0.37 to 2.67), 1.0 16 (24) 16 (24) 1.00 (0.33 to 3.06), 1.0
Double blind 13 (15) 13 (15) 1.00 (0.35 to 2.85), 1.0 10 (15) 10 (15) 1.00 (0.32 to 3.11), 1.0
Single blind 10 (12) 10 (12) 1.00 (0.32 to 3.16), 1.0 6 (9) 6 (9) 1.00 (0.25 to 3.95), 1.0
Multicenter 73 (85) 76 (89) 1.45 (0.54 to 3.89), 0.46 64 (97) 65 (99) —‡
Single center 8 (9) 7 (8) —‡ 1 (2) 1 (2) —‡
No of centers not specified 5 (6) 3 (4) 0.58 (0.13 to 2.53), 0.47 1 (2) 0 (0) —‡
Exclusively US sites 37 (43) 43 (50) 1.42 (0.73 to 2.77), 0.31 35 (53) 36 (55) 1.09 (0.49 to 2.42), 0.84
Location not specified 24 (28) 14 (16) 0.49 (0.23 to 1.04), 0.07 12 (18) 10 (15) 0.80 (0.31 to 2.03), 0.64

*Study was classified as pivotal if it was only one included in summary, multicenter randomized controlled trial, or explicitly noted in summary as being pivotal study.

†As calculated by generalized linear mixed effects model with canonical logit link and random effect placed on the intercept to account for heterogeneity across devices.

‡Too few events or counter-events for fitting of random effects model.