Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 11;350:h2613. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2613

Table 4.

 Findings in published reports of studies of high risk cardiovascular devices compared with FDA premarket approval summaries with corresponding publications. Figures are numbers (percentage) unless stated otherwise

All studies (n=152) Pivotal studies* (n=127)
Primary labeled secondary in publication 3 (2) 3 (2)
Primary not labeled in publication 43 (28) 36 (28)
Primary not found in publication 15 (10) 14 (11)
No primary in either SSED or publication 4 (3) 2 (2)
Endpoint definition:
 Identical 110 (72) 96 (76)
 Similar 9 (6) 9 (7)
 Unknown 33 (22) 22 (17)
Discrepancy in control type 13 (9) 13 (10)
No of patients analyzed:
 Mean difference (range) 8.9 (-81-272) 10.6 (-81-272)
 Mean % difference (range) 4.3 (-48-131) 5.3 (-48-131)
 Absolute mean difference (range) 15.9 (0-272) 17.8 (0-272)
 Absolute % difference (range) 8.2 (0-131) 9 (0-131)
 Discrepancy in No analyzed 46 (30) 43 (34)
Endpoint results:
 Content:
  Identical 69 (45) 55 (43)
  Similar 35 (23) 33 (26)
  Different 17 (11) 16 (13)
  Unknown 31 (20) 23 (18)
 Discrepancies in direction of favorability:
  Discrepancy 6 (4) 6 (5)
  No discrepancy 75 (49) 61 (48)
  Unknown if discrepancy 71 (47) 60 (47)

SSED=summary of safety and effectiveness data.

*Study was classified as pivotal if it was only one included in summary, multicenter randomized controlled trial, or explicitly noted in summary as being pivotal study