Skip to main content
. 2015 May 4;16(5):10105–10120. doi: 10.3390/ijms160510105

Table 3.

Pharmacokinetic parameters of R-α-lipoic acid after oral administration or intraduodenal administration of R-α-lipoic acid or R-α-lipoic acid/γ-cyclodextrin inclusion complex to pylorus ligated rats.

Formulation RLA RLA/γ-CD RLA RLA/γ-CD RLA-Na RLA-Na
Route id id id id iv iv
Group number 1 2 3 4 not determined not determined
Operation Sham Sham BDL BDL Sham BDL
Cmax or C0 (µg/mL) 5.7 ± 0.8 *,a,b 16.9 ± 5.2 *,a,c 5.8 ± 1.7 *,c,b 11.9 ± 3.5 *,b,d 79.4 ± 20.9 79.2 ± 10.9
Tmax (min) 1.8 ± 0.4 *,b 5.2 ± 2.9 1.8 ± 0.4 *,b 6.2 ± 3.2 *,b,d not determined not determined
AUC0–t (µg·min/mL) 49 ± 16 *,a,b 260 ± 50 *,a,c 54 ± 17 *,c,d 259 ± 55 *,b,d 516 ± 87 540 ± 79

Pharmacokinetic parameters are shown as mean ± standard deviation (n = 6). RLA, R-α-lipoic acid; RLA/γ-CD, R-α-lipoic acid/γ-cyclodextrin inclusion complex; RLA-Na, R-α-lipoic acid sodium salt; Cmax, maximum plasma RLA concentration; C0, initial concentration; Tmax, time of maximum plasma RLA concentration; AUC0–t, area under the plasma concentration curve (from initial to last points); id, intraduodenal; iv, intravenous; Sham, sham-operation; BDL, common bile duct ligation. *, Probability (p) < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed among the id groups by using analysis of variance by followed Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. a, Group 1 vs. 2; b, Group 1 vs. 4; c, Group 2 vs. 3; d, Group 3 vs. 4.