Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 7;66(12):3599–3609. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv070

Table 1.

Sirius cultivar parameters with the value ranges used in ideotype optimization, from Semenov et al. (2014)

(1) Using a model of canopy photosynthesis, it was shown that 10% in L could be achieved if λ (Rubisco specificity factor) was optimized (Zhu et al., 2010). (2) Genetic variations of Ph up to 20% were observed for wheat (Mossad et al., 1995; M. Ishag et al., 1998). (3) Varietal difference in number of days till heading under long and short day conditions varied between 9.74 and 107.40 in a photoperiodic response experiment (Košner and Žurková, 1996). (4) Genetic variation of Gf up to 40% was observed for wheat (Robert et al., 2001; Charmet et al., 2005; Akkaya et al., 2006). (5) The reported range of genetic variation for flag leaf area under unlimited water and nitrogen was up to 40% (Fischer et al., 1998; Shearman et al., 2005). (6) Large genotypic variation in root characteristics and water uptake was reported (Asseng et al., 1998; Manschadi et al., 2006).

Parameter Symbol Range
Photosynthesis
Light conversion efficiency L 1.10 (dimensionless) (1)
Phenology
Phyllochron Ph 70–130 (°Cd) (2)
Day length response Pp 0.05–0.70 (leaf h–1 day length) (3)
Duration of grain filling Gf 500–900 (°Cd) (4)
Canopy
Maximum area of flag leaf A 0.003–0.01 (m2 leaf m–2 soil) (5)
‘Stay green’ S 0–1.5 (dimensionless)
Drought tolerance
Response of photosynthesis to water stress Wsa 0.1–0.21 (dimensionless)
Maximum acceleration of leaf senescence caused by water deficiency Wss 1.2–1.9 (dimensionless)
Root water uptake
Rate of water uptake Ru 1–7% (6)
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure