Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 13;49(2):127–134. doi: 10.1007/s13139-015-0324-6

Table 3.

Relationships between 18F-FDG PET/CT and immunohistochemical results (n = 38)

Biologic marker (staining intensities) PET (+) PET (-) p-value
Thyroglobulin
 2, 3 (n = 31) 14 (45 %) 17 (55 %)
 0, 1 (n = 7) 7 (100 %) 0 (0 %) 0.01
Glut-1 (Memb)
 2 with luminal accentuation (n = 8) 6 (75 %) 2 (25 %)
 1 with luminal accentuation (n = 14) 9 (64 %) 5 (36 %)
 No luminal accentuation (n = 16) 6 (38 %) 10 (62 %) 0.06
Glut-1 (Memb)
 Positive (1, 2) (n = 28) 17 (61 %) 11 (39 %)
 Negative (0) (n = 10) 4 (40 %) 6 (60 %) 0.3
Glut-1 (Cyt)
 1 (n = 36) 20 (56 %) 16 (44 %)
 2 (n = 2) 1 (50 %) 1 (50 %) 1.0
NIS
 H-score >50 (n = 17) 11 (65 %) 6 (35 %)
 H-score ≤50 (n = 21) 10 (48 %) 11 (52 %) 0.3
SSTR1
 H-score >100 (n = 20) 12 (60 %) 8 (40 %)
 H-score ≤100 (n = 18) 9 (50 %) 9 (50 %) 0.8
SSTR2A
 H-score >50 (n = 26) 16 (62 %) 10 (38 %)
 H-score ≤50 (n = 12) 5 (42 %) 7 (58 %) 0.4

Memb cytoplasmic membrane, Cyt cytoplasm, Glut-1 glucose transporter 1, NIS sodium-iodide symporter, SSTR somatostatin receptor