Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 13;4:e13. doi: 10.1017/jns.2015.2

Table 5.

Changes in anthropometric and metabolic variables in response to the 12-week nutritional intervention programme

Men (n 57) Women (n 51) Men v. women differences Men v. women differences adjusted for baseline value
Variables Δ 0–12 weeks % Change from baseline P Δ 0–12 weeks % Change from baseline P Mean 95 % CI Mean 95 % CI
Body weight (kg) −1·0 −1·0 0·0003 −0·6 −0·8 0·06 −0·5 −1·3, 0·3 −0·6 −1·6, 0·3
BMI (kg/m2) −0·3 −1·0 0·0004 −0·2 −0·7 0·03 −0·1 −0·4, 0·1 −0·1 −0·4, 0·1
Body fat (%)‡ −0·7 −2·6 0·003 −0·2 −0·5 0·31 −0·4 −1·0, 0·2 −0·4 −1·4, 0·6
Waist circumference (cm) −1·3 −1·2 0·01 −1·1 −1·1 0·04 −0·2 −1·7, 1·3 0·02 −1·7, 1·7
HDL-C (mmol/l) 0·05 4·5 0·005 0·01 0·7 0·42 0·04 −0·01, 0·08 0·007 −0·05, 0·06
LDL-C (mmol/l) −0·03 −0·8 0·62 −0·06 −1·7 0·43 0·02 −0·2, 0·2 0·05 −0·1, 0·2
ApoB (g/l) −0·02 −1·7 0·33 −0·01 −0·9 0·58 −0·007 −0·05, 0·04 0·002 −0·04, 0·05
Total-C:HDL-C ratio −0·3 −5·9 < 0·0001 −0·1 −2·4 0·13 −0·2† −0·4, −0·03 −0·08 −0·3, 0·1
TAG (mmol/l)*§ −0·3 −15·8 0·0002 −0·09 −6·0 0·20 −0·2 −0·4, 0·03 0·01 −0·2, 0·2
TAG:HDL-C ratio*§ −0·3 −16·7 < 0·0001 −0·08 −7·3 0·26 −0·2† −0·4, −0·04 0·03 −0·1, 0·2
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 1·0 0·8 0·41 0·4 0·4 0·74 0·6 −3·0, 4·2 3·9 0·5, 7·4
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) −2·4 −3·2 0·01 −1·6 −2·3 0·10 −0·8 −3·3, 1·8 0·6 −1·9, 3·1
Fasting glucose (mmol/l)*§ 0·04 0·8 0·56 0·04 0·8 0·50 −0·007 −0·2, 0·2 0·02 −0·1, 0·2
Fasting insulin (pmol/l) −1·6 −1·6 0·61 0·4 0·5 0·91 −2·0 −11·2, 7·1 0·3 −8·3, 8·8

Δ 0–12 weeks, Change following the 12-week nutritional intervention programme; HDL-C, HDL-cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL-cholesterol; total-C, total cholesterol.

* Significant interaction between gender and baseline value (P ≤ 0·05).

† Significant differences in men v. women between 0–12 weeks without adjustment for the baseline value (P ≤ 0·05).

‡ Men (n 52) and women (n 48) because of missing values.

§ Analysis was performed on transformed values.