Table 1.
Experiment/mean pellet diameter D | Hour of cultivation (h) | Effective diffusivity D eff (μm2 s−1)a | External efficiency η e,m |
---|---|---|---|
#1 D = 3,700 (±400) μm | 24 | 634 ± 94 | 0.93 ± 0.05 |
48 | 1,164 ± 78 | 0.035 ± 0.005 | |
72 | 896 ± 47 | 0.0009 ± 0.0005 | |
96 | 887 ± 29 | 0.0009 ± 0.0004 | |
120 | 1155 ± 151 | 0.76 ± 0.18 | |
144 | 1342 ± 120 | 0.56 ± 0.34 | |
#2 D = 6,200 (± 900) μm | 24 | 993 ± 28 | 0.26 ± 0.05 |
48 | 789 ± 45 | 0.29 ± 0.06 | |
72 | 850 ± 48 | 0.0009 ± 0.0005 | |
96 | 1,027 ± 150 | 0.60 ± 0.06 | |
120 | 824 ± 115 | 0.65 ± 0.06 | |
144 | 925 ± 142 | 0.33 ± 0.05 | |
#3 1,400(±200) μm | 24 | 985 ± 11 | 0.93 ± 0.03 |
48 | 985 ± 20 | 0.97 ± 0.01 | |
72 | 909 ± 66 | 0.60 ± 0.05 | |
96 | 918 ± 120 | 0.92 ± 0.03 | |
120 | 1,691 ± 210 | 0.97 ± 0.04 | |
144 | 1,061 ± 123 | 0.98 ± 0.06 |
athe values of effective diffusivities were less accurately determined for these pellets, in which low oxygen concentration was observed