Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3598–3606. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.1323

Table 3.

Median PFS and OS Time by ERCC1 Polymorphisms

ERCC1 Genotype No. of Patients Median PFS (months) P Median OS (months) P
All participants
 Codon 118 in ERCC1 .410 .323
  C/C   40 19.6 42.7
  C/T 101 18.1 60.9
  T/T   92 22.8 52.7
C8092A in ERCC1 .051 .047
  C/C 131 24.1 68.6
  C/A or A/A 102 17.7 51.6

IP arm subset
 Codon 118 in ERCC1 .751 .385
  C/C   17 23.8 42.7
  C/T   51 18.4 66.9
  T/T   38 24.1 68.6
C8092A in ERCC1 .038 .046
  C/C   61 27.9 81.4
  C/A or A/A   45 18.3 52.6

IV arm subset
 Codon 118 in ERCC1 .440 .725
  C/C   23 17.8 47.1
  C/T   50 16.9 59.9
  T/T   54 20.9 50.4
C8092A in ERCC1 .465 .333
  C/C   70 20.3 56.5
  C/A or A/A   57 17.7 49.7

NOTE. PFS and OS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method, and median times are provided in months from enrollment. Log-rank test was used to compare survival distributions between groups.

Abbreviations: PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; IP, intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel; IV, intravenous cisplatin and paclitaxel.