Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 3.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Nov 12;57:155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.11.002

Table 1.

Total exploration time of the objects (s ± SEM) during the sample and test phases of the object-in-place (OIP), visual, tactile and crossmodal recognition memory tests. The total time for the sample phase is presented, whereas the time for the first minute is presented for the test phase. No significant differences in exploration were present, except for the increased exploration caused by polyI:C treatment during the sample phase of the crossmodal recognition test.

Group OIP Visual Tactile Crossmodal
salsal
Sample 102.21 ± 2.1 3.84 ± 0.4 39.33 ± 2.6 31.36 ± 2.0
Test 20.03 ± 0.9 2.34 ± 0.3 15.19 ± 0.9 3.44 ± 0.3
salpolyI:C
Sample 105.20 ± 2.7 4.27 ± 0.3 36.47 ± 1.8 35.86 ± 3.5a
Test 22.52 ± 1.4 1.98 ± 0.2 14.82 ± 1.0 2.71 ± 0.2
G31Psal
Sample 105.68 ± 3.7 3.94 ± 0.3 38.50 ± 3.1 29.60 ± 2.2
Test 21.08 ± 1.6 1.92 ± 0.2 14.65 ± 1.1 3.48 ± 0.3
G31PpolyI:C
Sample 97.67 ± 3.1 4.20 ± 0.5 34.90 ± 1.9 36.91 ± 3.2a
Test 22.78 ± 1.5 2.53 ± 0.4 14.99 ± 1.1 3.60 ± 0.5
a

Indicates the significant main effect of polyI:C treatment.