Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2015 May 22;54(22):3528–3542. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00246

Table 3.

m-Values Quantifying Effects of Polyols, Small PEGs, Other Solutes on LacDBD Unfolding and Dissociation of ConA Tetramer

Lac DBD unfolding m-value
(cal·mol−1·molal−1)
concanavalinA tetramer-dimer
m-value (cal·mol−1·molal−1)
Solute Experiment a Predicted b Experiment c,d Predicted b
EG 56.9 ± 11 --
Glycerol 203 ± 18 276 ± 34 170 ± 260 227 ± 37
DiEG 67.0 ± 34 53.8 ± 54 239 ± 53
TriEG −21.0 ± 29 −14.4 ± 73 411 ± 72
TetraEG −111 ± 41 −82.6 ± 98 e 583 ± 88 f
PEG300 −253 ± 64 −253 ± 170 1010 ± 180
urea −440 ± 10 d,g −512 ± 84 −855 ± 69 −547 ± 120
proline 773 ± 210 598 ± 41 694 ± 310
GB 820 ± 110 d,h 631 ± 470 2160 ± 76 724 ± 520
GuHCl −747 ± 60 i −895 ± 170
a

Determined at 40 °C.

b

Predicted at 25 °C using α-values from Table 2 for glycerol and for PEG end and interior groups, α-values from Diehl et al 37 for urea, proline and GB, and α-values from Pegram et al 39 for GuHCl. In all cases, ASA information is from Table S5; for lacDBD unfolding, an extended-chain model of unfolded lac DBD is used. 36

c

Determined at 20 °C 21

d

Experimental m-values are reported in cal mol−1 M−1. Values in cal mol−1 m−1 will be somewhat smaller in magnitude (except for initial slopes at low solute concentration); differences do not exceed the uncertainties listed.

e

Prediction from 25 °C tetraEG α values in Table 2 is −82.2 ± 79 cal·mol−1·molal−1

f

Prediction from 25 °C tetraEG α values in Table 2 is 581 ± 91 cal·mol−1·molal−1

g

Urea m-value at 25 °C is −449 ± 11 cal mol−1 M−1 59

h

GB m-value at 25 °C is 780 ± 110 cal mol−1 M−1 58

i

Experimental data and α-values are from Pegram et al 39.