Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;30(4 0 1):S25–S34. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000255

Table 1.

Measures1 Operational Definitions and Reliability & Validity noted

Measures Operational Definition (Collected 6 and 12 months post-intervention) Reliabilitya,b,c Validityd,e,f
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) 70 HF-related quality of life, symptom frequency & severity, sense of discouragement relative to having HF. 23-item Likert.a,c,d,e α = 0.90.a
The European Heart Failure Self Care Behavior Scale71,72 HF self-care skills practiced daily (maintaining their daily medications, fluid and sodium restrictions, monitoring HF symptoms
Information about HF home management
9-item Likerta α=.81
HF Knowledge Questionnaire.73 HF knowledge (i.e., What is the sodium intake per day for HF patients?) 8 multiple choice items, KR21 = 0.70
Patients’ HF rehospitalizations. Each occurrence was classified as HF-related hospitalization or not. Adjudicated by MDs blinded to group by using an a priori determined adjudication definition of HF (based on other NIH funded clinical trials)74 3-item Likerte,f
Group Appointment Helpfulness Evaluation Scale.75 Participants were asked to anonymously rate their group clinic experience in helping them manage their HF. 8-item Likertc,d,e α=.86 (1 = not helpful to 5 = very helpful)
1

These measures have confirmed discriminant or construct validity, internal consistency and reliability, and established specificity from large populations of HF patients. These measures also have published scores/standard deviations that distinguish clinically significant differences and are verified to be sensitive to change over time.