TABLE 4.
Comparison of prone and supine scanning for quantification of involved lymph nodes
| Patient | Prone | Supine | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 3 | 3 | concordant | |
| B | 6 | 5 | discordant | Better anatomical separation of deep structures on prone scan |
| C | - | - | ||
| D | 1 | 1 | concordant | |
| E | 7 | 4 | discordant | Better anatomical separation of deep structures on prone scan |
| F | 4 | 3 | discordant | Better anatomical separation of deep structures on prone scan |
| G | 2 | 2 | concordant | |
| H | 1 | 1 | concordant | |
| I | 7 | 8 | -- | Excluded due to part of axilla omitted from the field of view on prone scan |
| J | - | - | ||
| K | 2 | 2 | concordant | |
| L | 2 | 2 | concordant | |
| M | 2 | 2 | concordant | |
| N | 1 | 1 | concordant | |
| O | - | - | ||
| P | 0 | 3 | -- | Excluded due to part of axilla omitted from the field of view on prone scan |
| Q | - | - | ||
| R | - | - | ||
| S | - | - | ||
| T | 1 | 1 | concordant | |
| U | 9 | 5 | discordant | Better anatomical separation of deep structures on prone scan |
| V | 3 | 3 | concordant | |
| W | 4 | 4 | concordant | |
| X | 2 | 2 | concordant |