Table 3. Hierarchical Multiple Regression Analyses Predicting Frequency of Condom Use With a New or Casual Partner When Sober and When Intoxicated (N = 298).
| Condom use: sober | Condom use: intoxicated | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Variable | B | SE B | β | ΔR2 | B | SE B | β | ΔR2 |
| Step 1: control variables | .012 | .560** | ||||||
| Condom use when sober | NA | NA | NA | 0.82 | .04 | .75** | ||
| Social desirability | 0.10 | .40 | .02 | −0.02 | .29 | −.00 | ||
| Age | 0.05 | .03 | .11 | −0.00 | .02 | −.01 | ||
| Gender | 0.09 | .19 | .03 | 0.11 | .14 | .03 | ||
| Step 2: personality variables | .020* | .002 | ||||||
| Sensation seeking | −0.12 | .14 | −.05 | −0.04 | .10 | −.02 | ||
| Assertiveness | 0.25 | .11 | .13* | 0.08 | .08 | .04 | ||
| Step 3: alcohol variables | .040** | .038** | ||||||
| Alcohol expectancies | −0.40 | .12 | −.22** | −0.44 | .09 | −.22** | ||
| Alcohol consumption | −0.00 | .00 | −.03 | 0.00 | .00 | −.03 | ||
| Step 4: condom-use variables | .189** | .042** | ||||||
| Self-efficacy: partner | 0.39 | .22 | .12 | −0.02 | .17 | −.01 | ||
| Self-efficacy: intoxicated | 0.67 | .13 | .37** | 0.51 | .10 | .26** | ||
| Positive outcome expectancies | 0.18 | .07 | .15** | −0.06 | .05 | −.05 | ||
Note. For gender, men = 0 and women = 1. NA = not applicable.
p < .05
p < .01.