Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 14.
Published in final edited form as: Autoimmunity. 2011 Jan 14;44(3):211–218. doi: 10.3109/08916934.2010.530627

SLAMF6-driven co-stimulation of human peripheral T cells is defective in SLE T cells

Madhumouli Chatterjee 1,2,, Katalin Kis-Toth 1,, To-Ha Thai 1, Cox Terhorst 2, George C Tsokos 1
PMCID: PMC4465387  NIHMSID: NIHMS696590  PMID: 21231893

Abstract

The CD28 co-stimulatory pathway is well established for T cell activation. However, there is evidence suggesting the existence of additional co-stimulatory pathways. Here we report that a member of the SLAM superfamily, SLAMF6, or CD352 plays an important role in T cell co-stimulation. Cross-linking of SLAMF6 with anti-CD3 primes human T cell to secrete Th1 cytokines. Among the T cell subsets, CD8+ and CD3+CD4CD8 cells display the highest Th1 production responses. Engagement of SLAMF6 mobilizes the modulation of the same set of NF-κB-associated genes. Although the expression of SLAMF6 on the surface of T cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) T cells is comparable to that on the normal T cells, engagement of SLAMF6 results in severely reduced Th1 and IL-2 cytokine production. Our results suggest the existence of an additional co-stimulatory pathway in human T cells, which is defective in SLE T cells.

Keywords: SLAMF6, co-stimulation, systemic lupus erythematosus, Th1, NF-κB

Introduction

Although the specificity of T cell antigen recognition is determined by TCR, the biological consequences of this process are regulated by co-stimulatory molecules such as CD28, ICOS, and SLAM family receptors (CD150). The best characterized T cell co-stimulatory pathways involve CD28 and CTLA-4 on the surface of the T cells, and the partner B7 (CD80 and CD86) molecules on the surface of the B cells. B7/CD28 engagement provides signals that augment and sustain T cell activation in the context of TCR/CD3 signaling, while B7/CTLA-4 activation provides an inhibitory signal, which reduces immune responses and induces tolerance [1,2].

The co-stimulatory molecules of the SLAM family (SLAM, CD84, Ly108, CD48) and their adaptors were shown to perform important functions in the adaptive immune responses. The SLAM family immunoreceptors are expressed on a wide array of immune cells, including T and B lymphocytes. By virtue of their ability to transduce tyrosine phosphorylation signals through the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif sequences, they play an important role in regulating both innate and adaptive immune responses.

SLAMF6 (Ly108, human counterpart is NTB-A), a member of the SLAM family receptors is expressed on natural killer, T and B cells. Previous reports suggest that SLAMF6 co-stimulation drives naïve CD4+ T cells toward Th1 phenotype under Th1 polarizing conditions, that is in the presence of IL-2, the differentiating cytokine IL-12 and anti-IL4 antibody [3].

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by loss of tolerance to nuclear antigens and is accompanied by profound deregulation of the immune system. SLE T cells were reported to be defective in the production of the cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 [46].

Genome-wide linkage scans of families with multiple members affected with SLE have consistently demonstrated the presence of a susceptibility locus on chromosome 1q23, which includes the SLAMF genes [713]. Recent studies demonstrated that there is a variation within the human SLAM region that is associated with SLE [14]. Animal model experiments revealed that among the SLAM family members, SLAMF6 may be causally involved in the pathogenesis of lupus in mice [15,16].

In this paper, we addressed the question whether SLAMF6 co-stimulation affects the ability of T cells to produce cytokines under non-polarizing conditions, and if it does, whether this co-stimulation is defective in SLE T cells. We report that SLAMF6 represents a co-stimulatory molecule which primes T cells to produce Th1 cytokines. The co-stimulatory effect delivered by SLAMF6 was more prominent in CD8+ T cells and CD3+ CD4 CD8, double negative (DN) T cells, compared to CD4+ T cells. SLAMF6 co-stimulatory activation does not rescue the defective Th1 cytokine profile of the SLE T cells.

Materials and methods

Patients and controls

Ten SLE patients fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology revised classification criteria for SLE were studied. SLE disease activity index scores ranged from 0 to 20 (mean 7.2). Blood samples were obtained from 10 healthy platelet donors from the Kraft Family Blood Donor Center (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of BIDMC.

Antibodies and reagents

The following antibodies (Abs) were used for flow cytometry: anti-CD4-Pacific Blue, anti-CD8-PerCP, anti-TNF-α-PE, and anti-IFN-γ-Alexa Fluor 647 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA). The Abs used for the co-stimulation assays were anti-CD3 (Clone OKT3, Bio X Cell, West Lebanon, NH, USA) and anti-CD28 (Biolegend). The anti-NTBA Abs were custom made from Genentech (South San Francisco, CA, USA). For the co-stimulation assays we used the anti-NTBA clone 10B4.12.3.

SLAMF6 co-stimulation assay

Total T cells were isolated by negative selection (RosetteSep, Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada). T cell purity was always ≥96% monitored by flow cytometry. Then, 24-well plates were coated overnight with 1 or 0.1 µg/ml anti-CD3 Ab and 1, 2, or 5 µg/ml anti-CD28 Ab or 1, 2, or 5 µg/ml anti-SLAMF6 Ab (Genentech), and 1, 2, or 5 µg/ml IgG1. Total T cells were plated at 1.0 × 106 cells per well in RPMI medium supplemented by 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. On day 3, supernatants were removed for cytokine analysis by ELISA and the cells were collected for intracellular cytokine staining. Five hours before collection, brefeldin A (10 µg/ml; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) was added to the cell cultures. For detection of IL-2 in the supernatants, the cells were stimulated for 18 h.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Secreted cytokine concentrations were measured from cell supernatants using the DuoSet Human Immunoassay Kits for TNF-α and IFN-γ (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and the Human IL-2 ELISA Kit (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The optical density of the wells was determined using a microplate reader set at 450 nm.

Flow cytometry

Intracellular staining was performed with the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit, according to the instruction of the manufacturer. Samples were acquired in an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Analysis was performed with FlowJo v. 7.2.2 (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).

Real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR)

T cells were activated as mentioned above for 4 h. Total RNA was isolated from T cells by RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). PCR arrays were performed using the Human NF-κB Pathway PCR Array (SA Biosciences, Frederick, MD, USA) following the Manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription was performed from 1µg of total RNA using the RT2 First, Strand Kit (SA Biosciences). Quantitative real-time PCR were performed (Light Cycler 480, Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) with 40 cycles at 94°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s. Fold changes were calculated for each gene using the Manufacturer’s web-based PCR array data analysis.

Statistical analysis

The paired student two-tailed t-test was used for the statistical analyses. Each experiment was repeated at least on five different donors.

Results

SLAMF6 induces cytokine production in T cell subpopulations

Previous reports suggest that SLAMF6 provides co-stimulation signal to naïve CD4+ T cells, induces IFN-γ expression, and directs T cell polarization toward the Th1 lineage [1].

Based on this information, first we analyzed the cell surface expression of SLAMF6 on the different T cell subpopulations (CD4+, CD8+, and DN). The CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets expressed equal amount of cell surface SLAMF6, while the expression was lower in the DN cells (Figure 1A–C). Upon activation of T cells with anti-CD3 (aCD3) and aCD28 antibodies (Abs) we noted a significant up-regulation in the expression of SLAMF6 on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (Figure 1A,B). Expression of SLAMF6 on the surface of DN cells also increased, but not significantly.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cell-surface expression of SLAMF6 is upregulated in activated human T cells. Expression was detected on resting and activated T cells by flow cytometry using a PE-labeled monoclonal antibody against SLAMF6. SLAMF6 expression on (A) CD4+, (B) CD8+ and (C) DN T cells.

Next, we asked whether engagement of the SLAMF6 molecule in conjunction with CD3, under no polarizing conditions, resulted in production of cytokines. T cells were isolated from human peripheral blood and activated with aCD3 Ab at a standard 1 µg/ml concentration and various concentrations of aSLAMF6Ab. Cells treated with aCD3 Ab alone or in conjunction with aCD28 were used as control. Culture of human T cells with aCD3, aCD28, or aSLAMF6 alone did not induce substantial production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, or IL-2. Preliminary experiments revealed that a dose of 5 µg/ml of aSLAMF6 Ab in the presence of 1 µg/ml aCD3 resulted in optimal cytokine production (data not shown). Co-stimulation of CD4+ cells with aSLAMF6 Ab produced comparable amounts of IFN-γ and TNF-α, determined by intracellular staining, to those when stimulated with aCD28 (Figure 2A).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

SLAMF6 co-stimulation leads to production of Th1 cytokines and IL-2 by total T cells. SLAMF6 co-stimulation induces the intracellular production of IFN-γ and TNF-α in (A) CD4+, (B) CD8+ and (C) DN T cells. (D) SLAMF6 co-stimulation leads to IFN-γ and TNF-α secretion by total T cells. Black graphs: IFN-γ; striped graphs: TNF-α. (E) SLAMF6 co-stimulation leads to IL-2 secretion by total T cells.

In contrast, CD8+ (Figure 2B) and DN (Figure 2C) cells produced significantly more IFN-γ and TNF-α when co-stimulated with aSLAMF6 compared to aCD28 co-stimulation. Co-stimulation of total peripheral blood T cells with aSLAMF6 resulted in the secretion of higher amounts of IFN-γ and TNF-α compared to co-stimulation with aCD28 (Figure 2D). In contrast, co-stimulation of total peripheral blood T cells with aSLAMF6 resulted in the production of significantly less IL-2 compared to co-stimulation with aCD28 (Figure 2E). Thus, co-engagement of SLAMF6 results in the production of higher amounts of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IFN-γ and TNF-α by CD8+ and DN cells compared to co-stimulation with aCD28, and less amounts of IL-2.

T cell activation via the CD3/CD28 and CD3/SLAMF6 route activate the NF-κB pathway similarly

To investigate the potential differences between the CD28 and the SLAMF6 co-activation pathways we analyzed 84 specific genes connected with the NF-κB transcription factor activation in T cells using a gene array (Table I). Co-stimulation of T cells with either CD28 or SLAMF6 appeared to regulate the same set of genes. The average fold-change of the 84 genes was significantly higher in the aCD3/aCD28-treated cells compared to the aCD3/aSLAMF6-treated cells (21.4 vs. 18.9, p < 0.05). However, the fold-changes of the genes caspase 1, CSF2, and IFN-γ were significantly higher in case of the aCD3/aSLAMF6 treatment compared to the aCD3/aCD28 activation (3.1 vs. 0.002; 113.9 vs. 99.7 and 120.4 vs. 76.6, respectively).

Table I.

Gene list of the NF-κB gene array used in this study.

Unigene Refseq Symbol Description
Hs.19383 NM_000029 AGT Angiotensinogen (serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 8)
Hs.525622 NM_005163 AKT1 V-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1
Hs.648565 NM_005171 ATF1 Activating transcription factor 1
Hs.193516 NM_003921 BCL10 B cell CLL/lymphoma 10
Hs.31210 NM_005178 BCL3 B cell CLL/lymphoma 3
Hs.69771 NM_001710 CFB Complement factor B
Hs.696238 NM_001166 BIRC2 Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 2
Hs.405153 NM_006092 NOD1 Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing 1
Hs.2490 NM_033292 CASP1 Caspase 1, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase (interleukin 1, beta, convertase)
Hs.599762 NM_001228 CASP8 Caspase 8, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase
Hs.303649 NM_002982 CCL2 Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2
Hs.472860 NM_001250 CD40 CD40 molecule, TNF receptor superfamily member 5
Hs.390736 NM_003879 CFLAR CASP8 and FADD-like apoptosis regulator
Hs.198998 NM_001278 CHUK Conserved helix-loop-helix ubiquitous kinase
Hs.1349 NM_000758 CSF2 Colony stimulating factor 2 (granulocyte-macrophage)
Hs.2233 NM_000759 CSF3 Colony stimulating factor 3 (granulocyte)
Hs.631631 NM_020428 SLC44A2 Solute carrier family 44, member 2
Hs.352224 NM_080738 EDARADD EDAR-associated death domain
Hs.126667 NM_057159 LPAR1 Lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1
Hs.326035 NM_001964 EGR1 Early growth response 1
Hs.181128 NM_005229 ELK1 ELK1, member of ETS oncogene family
Hs.482562 NM_001992 F2R Coagulation factor II (thrombin) receptor
Hs.86131 NM_003824 FADD Fas (TNFRSF6)-associated via death domain
Hs.2007 NM_000639 FASLG Fas ligand (TNF superfamily, member 6)
Hs.25647 NM_005252 FOS V-fos FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog
Hs.74471 NM_000165 GJA1 Gap junction protein, alpha 1, 43 kDa
Hs.517581 NM_002133 HMOX1 Heme oxygenase (decycling) 1
Hs.421649 NM_000867 HTR2B 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 2B
Hs.643447 NM_000201 ICAM1 Intercellular adhesion molecule 1
Hs.37026 NM_024013 IFNA1 Interferon, alpha 1
Hs.93177 NM_002176 IFNB1 Interferon, beta1, fibroblast
Hs.856 NM_000619 IFNG Interferon, gamma
Hs.597664 NM_001556 IKBKB Inhibitor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells, kinase beta
Hs.321045 NM_014002 IKBKE Inhibitor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells, kinase epsilon
Hs.43505 NM_003639 IKBKG Inhibitor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells, kinase gamma
Hs.193717 NM_000572 IL10 Interleukin 10
Hs.1722 NM_000575 IL1A Interleukin 1, alpha
Hs.126256 NM_000576 IL1B Interleukin 1, beta
Hs.701982 NM_000877 IL1R1 Interleukin 1 receptor, type I
Hs.654458 NM_000600 IL6 Interleukin 6 (interferon, beta2)
Hs.624 NM_000584 IL8 Interleukin 8
Hs.522819 NM_001569 IRAK1 Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1
Hs.449207 NM_001570 IRAK2 Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 2
Hs.714791 NM_002228 JUN Jun oncogene
Hs.36 NM_000595 LTA Lymphotoxin alpha (TNF superfamily, member 1)
Hs.1116 NM_002342 LTBR Lymphotoxin beta receptor (TNFR superfamily, member 3)
Hs.601217 NM_173844 MALT1 Mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation gene 1
Hs.657756 NM_005921 MAP3K1 Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 1
Hs.82116 NM_002468 MYD88 Myeloid differentiation primary response gene (88)
Hs.631573 NM_033297 NLRP12 NLR family, pyrin domain containing 12
Hs.654408 NM_003998 NFKB1 Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells 1
Hs.73090 NM_002502 NFKB2 Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells 2 (p49/p100)
Hs.81328 NM_020529 NFKBIA Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells inhibitor, alpha
Hs.130036 NM_177952 PPM1A Protein phosphatase 1A (formerly 2C), magnesium-dependent, alpha isoform
Hs.159130 NM_002880 RAF1 V-raf-1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1
Hs.631886 NM_002908 REL V-rel reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog (avian)
Hs.502875 NM_021975 RELA V-rel reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog A (avian)
Hs.654402 NM_006509 RELB V-rel reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog B
Hs.436922 NM_005798 TRIM13 Tripartite motif-containing 13
Hs.247077 NM_001664 RHOA Ras homolog gene family, member A
Hs.519842 NM_003804 RIPK1 Receptor (TNFRSF)-interacting serine-threonine kinase 1
Hs.187946 NM_005415 SLC20A1 Solute carrier family 20 (phosphate transporter), member 1
Hs.642990 NM_007315 STAT1 Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1, 91 kDa
Hs.505874 NM_013254 TBK1 TANK-binding kinase 1
Hs.710895 NM_021649 TICAM2 Toll-like receptor adaptor molecule 2
Hs.654532 NM_003263 TLR1 Toll-like receptor 1
Hs.519033 NM_003264 TLR2 Toll-like receptor 2
Hs.657724 NM_003265 TLR3 Toll-like receptor 3
Hs.174312 NM_138554 TLR4 Toll-like receptor 4
Hs.662185 NM_006068 TLR6 Toll-like receptor 6
Hs.659215 NM_016562 TLR7 Toll-like receptor 7
Hs.660543 NM_138636 TLR8 Toll-like receptor 8
Hs.87968 NM_017442 TLR9 Toll-like receptor 9
Hs.598832 NM_182547 TMED4 Transmembrane emp24 protein transport domain containing 4
Hs.241570 NM_000594 TNF Tumor necrosis factor (TNF superfamily, member 2)
Hs.211600 NM_006290 TNFAIP3 Tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3
Hs.591834 NM_003844 TNFRSF10A Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 10a
Hs.521456 NM_003842 TNFRSF10B Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 10b
Hs.279594 NM_001065 TNFRSF1A Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 1A
Hs.355307 NM_001242 CD27 CD27 molecule
Hs.478275 NM_003810 TNFSF10 Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 10
Hs.129708 NM_003807 TNFSF14 Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 14
Hs.460996 NM_003789 TRADD TNFRSF1A-associated via death domain
Hs.29344 NM_182919 TICAM1 Toll-like receptor adaptor molecule 1
Hs.534255 NM_004048 B2M Beta-2-microglobulin
Hs.412707 NM_000194 HPRT1 Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1
Hs.523185 NM_012423 RPL13A Ribosomal protein L13a
Hs.592355 NM_002046 GAPDH Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
Hs.520640 NM_001101 ACTB Actin, beta

Impaired cytokine production in SLE T cells upon SLAMF6 co-stimulation

In the next set of experiments we investigated the effect of stimulation with aCD3/aSLAMF6 Abs in the production of cytokines by SLE T cells. T cells were isolated from peripheral blood of SLE patients (n = 10) and healthy control individuals (n = 10) and the cell surface expression of SLAMF6 molecules was investigated. We did not find significant differences in the amount of SLAMF6 molecules expressed on the surface of SLE T cell subsets compared to normal T lymphocyte populations whether unstimulated or after T cell activation with aCD3 and aCD28 Abs (data not shown).

SLE T cells stimulated with aCD3/aSLAMF6 Abs produced significantly less amounts of IFN-γ and TNF-α cytokines as determined by intracellular staining (Figure 3A–C) or in the cell culture supernatants (Figure 3D) compared to control T cells. The production of IL-2 cytokine upon aCD3/a-SLAMF6 Ab treatment was significantly reduced compared to normal T cells (Figure 3E).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cytokine production after SLAMF6 co-stimulation of SLE T cells. SLAMF6 co-stimulation induces the intracellular production of IFN-γ and TNF-α in (A) CD4+, (B) CD8+ and (C) DNSLE T cells. (D) SLAMF6 co-stimulation leads to IFN-γ and TNF-α secretion by total SLE T cells. Black graphs: IFN-γ; striped graphs: TNF-α. (E) SLAMF6 co-stimulation leads to IL-2 secretion by total SLE T cells.

Discussion

The engagement of the antigen specific receptor is essential for the activation of T or B lymphocytes. However, triggering the antigen receptor is not the only factor determining lymphocyte activity. Multiple other receptor–ligand interactions are necessary for a productive activation of naive lymphocytes [17,18]. These interactions can deliver co-stimulatory or co-inhibitory signals and are important for the fine-tuning of the immune response. Members of the CD28/B7 family of co-stimulatory molecules are generally considered to be key players in the co-stimulatory pathway. However, there are reports on CD28 deficient T cells indicating the existence of co-stimulatory molecules other than CD28 [19].

Here, we report that SLAMF6 can prime T cells to produce Th1 cytokines IFN-γ and TNF-α by peripheral T cells in the absence of polarizing conditions and it seems to be a stronger co-stimulator compared to the CD28 engagement in terms of Th1 cytokine production in case of the CD8+ and DN T cells. In addition, engagement of SLAMF6 results in the production of lower amounts of IL-2 compared to the engagement of CD28.

These studies prompted us to investigate the role of SLAMF6 co-stimulation in the production of the different Th1 cytokines in SLE patients. SLE T cells have been described previously to produce decreased amounts of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 [46]. Although some of the molecular events that lead to decreased cytokine production were studied [20,21], it is unclear whether early events associated with the transfer of the signal from the co-stimulatory molecule inside the cell are defective. It was important to study the ability of additional co-stimulatory molecules to induce the production of cytokines.

The fact, reported herein, that engagement of SLAMF6 provides insufficient co-stimulation to SLE T cells to produce cytokines, in a manner similar to the engagement of CD28, suggests that downstream events account for the defective production of cytokines in SLE T cells. The fact, that most of the NF-κB-associated genes are modulated equally following the engagement of SLAMF6 and CD28 in normal human T cells suggests that in SLE T cells molecular events modifying the NF-κB pathway account for the decreased production of cytokines or that there is an inherent defect in the NF-κB pathway. It was reported that p65, an important component of the NF-κB complex is decreased in SLE T cells [22], for unclear reasons.

A co-stimulatory molecule-driven degradation of p65 which may be enhanced in SLE T cells may account for this. Alternatively, molecular events unrelated to the NF-κB are responsible for the decreased production of cytokines in SLE T cells. Given that the transcription of the IL-2, TNF-α, and IFN-γ is controlled through different mechanisms, the answer to the question may be more complicated. For example, increased expression of the transcriptional repressor may account for the decreased production of IL-2 in SLE T cells [23].

One observation of interest is the fact that CD8+ and DN cells display a higher propensity to produce cytokines following engagement of SLAMF6. This provides a functional link between CD8+ and DN cells that share gene expression profile, and it was shown that at least some of the DN cells may represent CD8+ cells which lost CD8 from the surface membrane.

DN cells are expanded in SLE patients [24] and CD8+ cells were shown repeatedly to display compromised function. For example, CD8+ cells cannot eliminate virally infected self cells [25] and display decreased amounts of CD3ζ on the surface membrane [26]. The defective production of cytokines by SLE T cells, although it appears to involve all T cell subsets, may be more pronounced among CD8+ and DN cells.

Our study has provided first insight into the SLAMF6-mediated co-stimulatory pathway in human T cells and revealed it to be impressively defective in SLE T cells. Our studies have opened a line to further understand the way T cells malfunction in SLE patients.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants [PO1AI 065687, RO1AI42269]; and the Kirkland Scholar Program. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Greenwald RJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. The B7 family revisited. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:515–548. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Teft WA, Kirchhof MG, Madrenas J. A molecular perspective of CTLA-4 function. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006;24:65–97. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Valdez PA, Wang H, Seshasayee D, van Lookeren Campagne M, Gurney A, Lee WP, Grewal IS. NTB-A, a new activating receptor in T cells that regulates autoimmune disease. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:18662–18669. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312313200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tsokos GC, Balow JE. Cellular immune responses in systemic lupus erythematosus. Prog Allergy. 1984;35:93–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kammer GM. Altered regulation of IL-2 production in systemic lupus erythematosus: An evolving paradigm. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:836–840. doi: 10.1172/JCI24791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tsokos GC, Boumpas DT, Smith PL, Djeu JY, Balow JE, Rook AH. Deficient gamma-interferon production in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29:1210–1215. doi: 10.1002/art.1780291005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moser KL, Gray-McGuire C, Kelly J, Asundi N, Yu H, Bruner GR, Mange M, Hogue R, Neas BR, Harley JB. Confirmation of genetic linkage between human systemic lupus erythematosus and chromosome 1q41. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1902–1907. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199909)42:9<1902::AID-ANR16>3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shai R, Quismorio FP, Jr, Li L, Kwon OJ, Morrison J, Wallace DJ, Neuwelt CM, Brautbar C, Gauderman WJ, Jacob CO. Genome-wide screen for systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility genes in multiplex families. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:639–644. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.4.639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tsao BP, Cantor RM, Grossman JM, Kim SK, Strong N, Lau CS, Chen CJ, Shen N, Ginzler EM, Goldstein R, Kalunian KC, Arnett FC, Wallace DJ, Hahn BH. Linkage and interaction of loci on 1q23 and 16q12 may contribute to susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:2928–2936. doi: 10.1002/art.10590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tsao BP, Cantor RM, Kalunian KC, Chen CJ, Badsha H, Singh R, Wallace DJ, Kitridou RC, Chen SL, Shen N, Song YW, Isenberg DA, Yu CL, Hahn BH, Rotter JI. Evidence for linkage of a candidate chromosome 1 region to human systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:725–731. doi: 10.1172/JCI119217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Johanneson B, Lima G, von Salome J, Alarcon-Segovia D, Alarcon-Riquelme ME. A major susceptibility locus for systemic lupus erythemathosus maps to chromosome 1q31. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71:1060–1071. doi: 10.1086/344289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gray-McGuire C, Moser KL, Gaffney PM, Kelly J, Yu H, Olson JM, Jedrey CM, Jacobs KB, Kimberly RP, Neas BR, Rich SS, Behrens TW, Harley JB. Genome scan of human systemic lupus erythematosus by regression modeling: Evidence of linkage and epistasis at 4p16-15.2. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;67:1460–1469. doi: 10.1086/316891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wakeland EK, Liu K, Graham RR, Behrens TW. Delineating the genetic basis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunity. 2001;15:397–408. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00201-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vyse TJ, Richardson AM, Walsh E, Farwell L, Daly MJ, Terhorst C, Rioux JD. Mapping autoimmune disease genes in humans: Lessons from IBD and SLE. Novartis Found Symp. 2005;267:94–107. discussion 107–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wandstrat AE, Nguyen C, Limaye N, Chan AY, Subramanian S, Tian XH, Yim YS, Pertsemlidis A, Garner HR, Jr, Morel L, Wakeland EK. Association of extensive polymorphisms in the SLAM/CD2 gene cluster with murine lupus. Immunity. 2004;21:769–780. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kumar KR, Li L, Yan M, Bhaskarabhatla M, Mobley AB, Nguyen C, Mooney JM, Schatzle JD, Wakeland EK, Mohan C. Regulation of B cell tolerance by the lupus susceptibility gene Ly108. Science. 2006;312:1665–1669. doi: 10.1126/science.1125893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sharpe AH, Freeman GJ. The B7-CD28 superfamily. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:116–126. doi: 10.1038/nri727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Veillette A, Latour S, Davidson D. Negative regulation of immunoreceptor signaling. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:669–707. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.081501.130710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lucas PJ, Negishi I, Nakayama K, Fields LE, Loh DY. Naive CD28-deficient T cells can initiate but not sustain an in vitro antigen-specific immune response. J Immunol. 1995;154:5757–5768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Crispin JC, Liossis SN, Kis-Toth K, Lieberman LA, Kyttaris VC, Juang YT, Tsokos GC. Pathogenesis of human systemic lupus erythematosus: Recent advances. Trends Mol Med. 2010;16:47–57. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2009.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lieberman LA, Tsokos GC. The IL-2 defect in systemic lupus erythematosus disease has an expansive effect on host immunity. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;740619 doi: 10.1155/2010/740619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wong HK, Kammer GM, Dennis G, Tsokos GC. Abnormal NF-kappa B activity in T lymphocytes from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with decreased p65-RelA protein expression. J Immunol. 1999;163:1682–1689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Solomou EE, Juang YT, Gourley MF, Kammer GM, Tsokos GC. Molecular basis of deficient IL-2 production in T cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 2001;166:4216–4222. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.6.4216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Crispin JC, Oukka M, Bayliss G, Cohen RA, Van Beek CA, Stillman IE, Kyttaris VC, Juang YT, Tsokos GC. Expanded double negative T cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus produce IL-17 and infiltrate the kidneys. J Immunol. 2008;181:8761–8766. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.12.8761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tsokos GC, Magrath IT, Balow JE. Epstein-Barr virus induces normal B cell responses but defective suppressor T cell responses in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 1983;131:1797–1801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liossis SN, Ding XZ, Dennis GJ, Tsokos GC. Altered pattern of TCR/CD3-mediated protein-tyrosyl phosphorylation in T cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Deficient expression of the T cell receptor zeta chain. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:1448–1457. doi: 10.1172/JCI1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES