Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Microsc. 2012 Oct 18;248(3):245–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03669.x

Table 6.

McNemar Chi Squared Test Measuring Statistical Significance

McNemar Chi Squared Test (with 1 Degree of Freedom) with Likelihood [confidence
interval (CI, %)] that Modified Absolute Gradient count (Equation 21) is statistically
different from other focus functions with regard to accurate location of tissue
surfaces.
Eq. Function Training Test Set1 Test Set2 Thickness
Test Set
X2 CI X2 CI X2 CI X2 CI
(3) Absolute Gradient 0.25 38 NSD* 0 NSD* 0 0.25 38
(4) Squared Gradient 0.13 28 0.56 55 6.04 99 2.52 23
(5) Brenner Gradient 0.25 38 0.56 55 NSD* 0 0.06 20
(20) Modified Absolute
Gradient
NSD* 0 0.28 40 0.25 38 2.08 85
(22) Filtered Modified
Absolute Gradient
NSD* 0 0.28 40 0.25 38 0.08 23
(23) Filtered Modified
Absolute Gradient
Count
NSD* 0 NSD* 0 0.25 38 0.13 28
(6) Content 22.23 100 24.01 100
(8) Image Power 25.01 100 24.01 100
(7) Pixel Count 25.01 100 19.01 100
(9) Tenenbaum
Gradient
1.23 73 8.03 100
(10) Energy Laplace 0.56 55 1.13 71 19.01 100 8.22 100
(11) Variance 13.35 100 22.01 100
(12) Normal Variance 17.28 100 22.01 100
(13) Autocorrelation 0.28 40 4.69 97
(14) St Dev
Autocorrelation
23.22 100 24.01 100
(15) Range 14.33 100 22.01 100
(16) Entropy 15.31 100 20.01 100
*

NSD = No statistical difference