Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 11;3:e1013. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1013

Table 1. Data summary statistics.

Summary statistics calculated from the data collected at two sites under two light conditions. Each cell shows: mean ± standard deviation (95% confidence interval about the mean).

Treatment λG, tip growth rate (nodes yr−1) λD, basal death rate (nodes yr−1) A, mean age at branching (yr) P, Pr (node branching) λT, net rate of increase in number of nodes (nodes yr−1) B, rate of increase in number of stems (stems yr−1)
Conway high light 6.5 ± 5.6 2.1 ± 2.8 0.38 ± 0.13 0.042 5.3 ± 6.3 0.26 ± 0.58
(N = 46) (5.0, 8.1) (1.4, 3.0) (0.30, 0.45) (0.022, 0.071) (3.4, 7.1) (0.11, 0.46)
Conway low light 6.0 ± 4.5 5.9 ± 6.5 0.36 ± 0.13 0.030 0.12 ± 8.2 0.17 ± 0.38
(N = 46) (4.8, 7.3) (4.1, 7.8) (0.28, 0.46) (0.012, 0.060) (−2.2, 2.5) (0.065, 0.28)
Hamilton high light 9.3 ± 8.2 2.9 ± 5.6 0.14 ± 0.23 0.023 9.8 ± 9.6 0.27 ± 0.48
(N = 70) (7.5, 11.3) (1.7, 4.3) (0.06, 0.25) (0.014, 0.036) (7.6, 12.0) (0.17, 0.39)
Hamilton low light 9.8 ± 5.1 2.1 ± 5.0 0.38 ± 0.18 0.004 9.0 ± 8.4 0.03 ± 0.17
(N = 70) (8.6, 11.1) (0.99, 3.2) (0.25, 0.5) (0.001, 0.014) (7.0, 11.0) (0.00, 0.071)