. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 14.

Published in final edited form as: Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis. 2007 Oct;2007:10.1109/ICCV.2007.4409157. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4409157

Table 1.

Average alignment errors in mm for the three atlases. Best alignment for each Brodmann area is in bold. The last two rows of each table contain a statistical comparison (permutation test p-value) between the label-matched atlas LM9 and the image-matched atlases IM10 and IM40. The p-values that do not reach significance are shown in italic.

Left Hemisphere

	V1	BA4a	BA4p	BA2	V2	BA6	BA44	BA45

IM10	3.83	4.38	3.77	6.28	4.64	7.01	7.41	6.81
IM40	2.89	3.81	3.60	5.62	4.25	7.06	7.57	6.92
LM9	2.34	2.86	3.00	4.63	3.31	5.87	6.92	4.63
P-values
IM10 v. LM9	10⁻⁶	10⁻⁶	10⁻⁶	10⁻⁶	10⁻⁶	10⁻⁶	1.2 × 10⁻¹	10⁻⁶
IM40 v. LM9	10⁻⁶	10⁻⁶	3.8×10⁻⁵	3.5×10⁻⁵	10⁻⁶	1.2×10⁻⁴	6.7 × 10⁻²	10⁻⁶

Right Hemisphere

	V1	BA4a	BA4p	BA2	V2	BA6	BA44	BA45

IM10	3.85	3.76	3.11	5.92	3.97	6.50	11.54	9.88
IM40	2.70	3.58	2.92	5.66	3.58	6.34	10.49	9.20
LM9	2.39	3.07	2.89	4.73	3.05	5.90	9.72	7.40
P-values
IM10 v. LM9	10⁻⁶	10⁻⁶	2.8 × 10⁻²	10⁻⁶	10⁻⁶	3.8 × 10⁻²	6.6 × 10⁻³	3 × 10⁻⁴
IM40 v. LM9	8.7⁻⁴	2.1×10⁻⁴	4.0 × 10⁻¹	8.6×10⁻⁵	10⁻⁶	8.9 × 10⁻²	1.3 × 10⁻¹	4.2⁻³